Communication Techniques for Better Conversations: Why Most People Are Doing It Wrong

Some of Our Blogs: Why Professional Development Courses Are Essential for Career Growth | The Role of Professional Development Courses in a Changing Job Market | Why Companies Should Invest in Professional Development | Professional Development Training

Three months ago, I watched a perfectly qualified project manager torpedo a $2.3 million contract during what should've been a routine client check-in. Not because of budget issues, timeline problems, or technical failures. Because she couldn't communicate properly with another human being.

It's everywhere. Walk into any office in Sydney, Melbourne, or Perth, and you'll witness the same tragedy playing out daily. Smart people - engineers, accountants, consultants who can solve complex problems in their sleep - stumbling through basic conversations like teenagers asking someone to prom.

Here's the thing that drives me mental: most communication training focuses on the wrong bloody things. Presentation slides. Email etiquette. Meeting protocols. Meanwhile, the real magic happens in those unscripted moments between agenda items, in corridor conversations, during coffee breaks when someone actually decides whether they trust you enough to work with you.

The Listening Myth That's Destroying Conversations

Everyone bangs on about "active listening" like it's some revolutionary concept. Listen more, talk less. Nod. Make eye contact. Repeat back what you heard.

Rubbish.

I've seen too many people turn active listening into a mechanical performance that makes them look like bobblehead dolls. The real skill isn't just listening - it's knowing what to listen for. After fifteen years of training everyone from call centre staff to C-suite executives, I can tell you the difference between good and great communicators comes down to pattern recognition.

Great communicators pick up on the stuff that's not being said. When someone's explaining a "minor hiccup" with unusual precision, they're probably panicking internally. When a client keeps mentioning budget constraints unprompted, they're already shopping around. When your team member suddenly becomes overly formal in their emails, they're either updating their LinkedIn or planning to quit.

Emotional intelligence training isn't just corporate buzzword nonsense - it's pattern recognition at scale. But here's where most people get it wrong: they think emotional intelligence means being nice all the time. Sometimes the most emotionally intelligent thing you can do is call out the elephant in the room that everyone's pretending not to see.

Why "Professional Communication" Is Often Unprofessional

The corporate world has convinced us that professional communication means sanitising every interaction until it's devoid of personality. Generic pleasantries. Diplomatic non-statements. Emails that say absolutely nothing in three paragraphs.

This is actually unprofessional because it wastes everyone's time and builds zero relationship equity.

I was working with a manufacturing company in Adelaide last year where the production manager and quality control supervisor had been sending increasingly passive-aggressive emails for months. Beautiful professional language. Perfect cc protocols. Completely dysfunctional working relationship that was costing them $18,000 per week in rework.

The breakthrough came when I got them in a room and the production manager finally said, "Look, I think your quality standards are unrealistic given our current equipment limitations." Quality control supervisor replied, "And I think you're cutting corners because you're afraid of missing targets."

Boom. Real conversation. Productive argument. Problem solved in forty-five minutes.

The most professional thing you can do is communicate like a human being who actually cares about outcomes rather than optics.

The Questions That Actually Work

Here's something that'll change your workplace conversations immediately: stop asking "How are you?" unless you actually want to know.

Instead, try these:

"What's working well for you this week?" - Gets people talking about positives first, builds rapport, often reveals process improvements.

"What's on your mind about [specific project]?" - Opens space for concerns without making them feel like they're complaining.

"Help me understand..." - The magic phrase for navigating disagreements without triggering defensiveness.

"What would you do if you were in my position?" - Gets buy-in because people support solutions they help create.

I learned this the hard way during a particularly disastrous project with a Brisbane logistics company. I kept asking the warehouse supervisor "Are there any problems?" and getting "Nope, all good" while packages were literally piling up behind him. Changed it to "What's your biggest headache this week?" and suddenly got a twenty-minute download on staffing issues, equipment failures, and process bottlenecks I could actually help fix.

The Timing Thing Nobody Talks About

When you have these conversations matters more than what you say. Friday afternoon after a stressful week? Forget it. Monday morning when everyone's drowning in emails? Not happening. Right after someone's been criticised in a meeting? You might as well be speaking Mandarin.

The sweet spot is Tuesday to Thursday, mid-morning when people have dealt with urgent stuff but aren't yet thinking about lunch. Even better if you can catch them after they've just solved something or received good news.

But here's the really sneaky bit - sometimes the worst timing is actually the best timing. Those conversations that happen during minor crises often reveal more truth than any scheduled one-on-one. When people are stressed, they drop their professional masks and you get to see who they really are and what they actually care about.

Technology Is Making Us Worse at This

I know, I know. Everyone's complaining about phones and social media ruining communication. But it's not just the obvious stuff.

The real problem is we're losing tolerance for conversational friction. Authentic workplace communication involves disagreement, confusion, awkward pauses, clarifying questions. It's messy. It takes time. It requires actual presence.

We've become addicted to the efficiency of text-based communication where you can craft perfect responses and avoid real-time pushback. But all those Slack conversations and email threads that feel so productive? They're often just elaborate ways of avoiding the difficult conversation that would solve everything in fifteen minutes.

I worked with a tech startup recently where the development team and marketing team had been having the same argument via email for six weeks. Sixty-seven messages between four people about website functionality. Got them all on a video call for thirty minutes. Turns out they were arguing about completely different things and once they understood each other's actual concerns, the solution was obvious.

The irony is that effective communication training often gets delivered through the least effective medium possible - online modules where people click through slides alone. Communication is inherently interpersonal. You can't learn it in isolation any more than you can learn to swim by reading about water.

The Feedback Loop Most People Break

Here's where good intentions go to die: people think giving feedback means delivering a monologue about what someone did wrong, then walking away feeling like they've "communicated clearly."

Real feedback is circular. You say something, check for understanding, adjust based on their response, check again. Most feedback fails because people skip the checking part.

"I need you to be more proactive with client updates" sounds clear, but what does "proactive" actually mean? Daily emails? Weekly calls? Immediate notification of any changes? The person receiving this feedback might think they're being perfectly proactive while you think they're being reactive.

Better approach: "I'd like to see client updates happen before clients have to ask for them. What would that look like from your perspective?" Then you have an actual conversation about expectations rather than a one-way information download.

The Australian Advantage (And Disadvantage)

Working in Australia gives us some unique communication advantages that we don't leverage enough. Our cultural tendency toward directness means we can cut through corporate waffle faster than most places. We're comfortable with informal relationship-building. We don't take ourselves too seriously.

But we also underestimate how much this directness can intimidate people from other cultural backgrounds or those who equate formality with respect. I've seen brilliant Australian managers completely mystify their international colleagues by being simultaneously too casual and too blunt.

The trick is code-switching - matching your communication style to what the situation and person need, not just defaulting to what feels natural to you.

What Actually Changes Behaviour

Here's something that might surprise you: telling people what to do differently rarely changes anything. What changes behaviour is helping people understand why their current approach isn't getting them what they want.

That project manager I mentioned at the beginning? She wasn't failing because she didn't know communication "techniques." She was failing because she was trying to control outcomes by controlling information. Once she understood that transparency actually gave her more influence than secrecy, everything shifted.

Most communication problems aren't really communication problems - they're trust problems, power problems, or clarity problems wearing communication costumes.

Workplace communication training that focuses purely on techniques without addressing underlying motivations is like teaching someone to paint by numbers and expecting them to create art.

The best communicators I know aren't the ones with the most polished presentations or the smoothest small talk. They're the ones who consistently demonstrate that they care more about getting good outcomes than looking good while getting them.

And honestly? Once you start communicating like that, everything else becomes easier. The techniques matter less because the intent is clearer. People trust you faster because your actions match your words. Difficult conversations become routine because you're not trying to manipulate the response.

It's not rocket surgery, as they say. But it does require giving up the illusion that communication is about controlling how other people perceive you and accepting that it's actually about creating genuine understanding between flawed humans trying to get stuff done together.

Which, when you think about it, is exactly what business is supposed to be about anyway.